Skip to content
Panehop

Compare

Panehop and the alternatives, honestly

Every switcher on this page is good at something, and one of them is free. Here is what each owns, where Panehop differs, and the table to check it against. Prices and statuses as of 29 August 2026.

Feature comparison between Panehop and other macOS window switchers
CriterionPanehopAltTabWitchrcmdRaycast
Search-to-switch across windowsFuzzy, acronym-weighted, over titlesYesNoPartlyPartlyPartly
Two-keystroke Fast SearchHold a modifier, type, releaseYesNoNoPartlyNo
Per-window ⌘TabYesYesYesNoNo
Focus a window on another SpaceYesYesYesYesYes
No Screen Recording permissionYesNoYesYesYes
Actively maintainedYesYesYesYesYes
One-time priceYesYesYesYesPartly
Price$14.99 one-timeFree$14~$10–15Free tier
StatusMaintainedVery activeActiveActiveActive

Yes / Partly / No as marked. Names belong to their owners. If we have a fact wrong, tell support and it will be corrected.

One at a time

What each one owns.

AltTab

Free · Very active

What it owns. Windows-style thumbnail grid for ⌘Tab; open source; enormous community.

Where Panehop differs. Thumbnails need Screen Recording, and a grid stops scaling past a few dozen windows. No search-first switching.

Witch

$14 · Active

What it owns. The closest keyboard model: per-window lists with in-panel search, deeply configurable.

Where Panehop differs. Search happens after you open a panel; there is no global two-keystroke Fast Search.

rcmd

~$10–15 · Active

What it owns. Right-⌘ plus a letter to jump to an app; fuzzy window search inside.

Where Panehop differs. App-centric: the letter picks an app, and windows come second. No per-window ⌘Tab cycling.

Raycast

Free tier · Active

What it owns. A launcher with window search inside it — and a hundred other things.

Where Panehop differs. Launcher first: open Raycast, type, pick. Slower than a held modifier and two letters, and there is no ⌘Tab cycling.